Bilal v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant abandoned the anticipatory bail application as he admitted to being already arrested. The court dismissed the application on that ground without adjudication on merits.
The applicant abandoned the anticipatory bail application as he admitted to being already arrested. The court dismissed the application on that ground without adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 42
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10380 of 2021
Applicant :- Bilal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Avanish Pratap Singh,Udai Bhan Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press the present anticipatory bail application as the applicant has already been arrested by the police.
In view of the statement, so made, present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 2.6.2021 Shekhar
Digitally signed by Justice Rohit Ranjan Agarwal Date: 2021.06.02 13:48:08 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Bilal
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court