Islam v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The anticipatory bail application was rejected as it was not pressed by the applicant. A direction to dispose of any regular bail application expeditiously on the same day was issued.
What the court decided
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10361 of 2021
Applicant :- Islam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sachchidanand Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the applicant Islam in Case Crime No. 34 of 2021, under sections 3/5/8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, P.S. Tarya Sujan, District Jaunpur.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application provided that a direction be issued to the learned court below to dispose of the bail application of the applicant, if given, expeditiously on the same day.
In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application is rejected as not pressed.
A direction is however given to the court below that in case applicant surrenders and gives bail application, the same shall be disposed of expeditiously and preferably on the same day in accordance with law.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Islam
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/10361/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court