The Court rejected an anticipatory bail application under S. 438 Cr.P.C. because the charge sheet had already been submitted, rendering the application infructuous.
The anticipatory bail application stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10239 of 2021
Applicant :- Shivendra Pratap Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Babloo Pant,Shri Krishan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Shree Krishna Yadav
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. Perused the record.
It has been submitted by Shri Babloo Pant, learned counsel for the applicant that the charge sheet has been submitted against the applicant, therefore, this anticipatory bail application has rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands REJECTED as such.
Order Date :- 19.8.2021 M. Kumar
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shivendra Pratap
State of U.P.
Rahul Chaturvedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
