Prem Pal Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under S. 438 Cr.P.C. was rejected on grounds of frivolity due to the applicant's prior arrest, rendering the application infructuous.
Anticipatory bail application under S. 438 Cr.P.C. was rejected on grounds of frivolity due to the applicant's prior arrest, rendering the application infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10193 of 2021
Applicant :- Prem Pal Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State are present.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the application has become infructuous on account of arrest of applicant.
In view of the submission made above, the anticipatory bail application is rejected being infructuous.
Order Date :- 15.7.2021 Bhanu
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prem Pal Singh
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court