Qayyum Ahmad v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a cheating and forgery case alleging jurisdictional lapses. The Single Judge declined to exercise powers under Section 438 Cr.P.C., citing the applicant's role in the offence, but directed approach for regular bail within 18 days pending familiarity with the record.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail refused. Directed to apply for regular bail before the Sessions Court by 18.10.2021 and no arrest until the date of hearing or surrender.