M/S Narayan Filing Station v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant withdrew an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. which had been asserted was premature; the application stands dismissed.
The applicant withdrew an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. which had been asserted was premature; the application stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8114 of 2021
Applicant :- M/S Narayan Filing Station Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ravi Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard Sri Ravi Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned AGA-I appearing for the Stateopposite party no.1.
Learned AGA-I points out that from a bare reading of the order dated 16.01.2021 it is apparent that in terms of the said order the application filed by the applicant seeking disposal of the proceedings on the basis of a final report stated to have been filed in an earlier criminal case bearing No. 253/2017 under Section 3/7 of Essential Commodities Act, has been rejected. It is further pointed out that the material on record does not indicate that the applicant has been summoned in proceedings of Case No. 2404 of 2017 under the Weights and Measures Act and as such the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is premature.
Learned counsel for the applicant has not disputed the aforesaid factual position and states that he does not wish to press the application at this stage and prays for its withdrawal.
The application stands dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 18.8.2021 Imroz
(Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.)
M/s Narayan Filing Station
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court