Vijai Kumar v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed as infructuous due to lapse of time and absence of parties.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. dismissed as infructuous due to lapse of time and absence of parties.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7698 of 2007
Applicant :- Vijai Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- K.K. Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
The case is listed in the heading under cases likely to be infructuous without objection.
Neither any interim order is there nor any one is present to press this application, even in the revised call.
It appears that due to lapse of time, the application has lost its efficacy and has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 3.12.2021 SK Goswami
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijai Kumar
State of U.P.
Subhash Vidyarthi
SK Goswami
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court