Shukrana Batbool v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7455 of…
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7455 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7455 of 2021
Applicant :- Shukrana Batbool Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard Sri Uma Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned counsel appearing for the Stateopposite party.
The present application has been filed seeking to quash the impugned judgment and order dated 18.02.2021 passed by the IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Basti in Criminal Revision No.102 of 2020 (Jamirunnisha v. State of U.P. and Others), Police Station- Kotwali, District- Basti.
Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned AGA-I appearing on behalf of Stateopposite party points out that in terms of the order passed by the revisional court, which is sought to be challenged, the matter has simply been remanded to the Magistrate and in view thereof, there is no occasion to challenge the order.
Learned counsel for the applicant does not dispute the aforesaid position and states that the applicant does not wish to press the application.
Application stands accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 29.7.2021 Nitendra
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.)
Shukrana Batbool
State of U.P.
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court