Smt Nidhirani v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CRPC held infructuous; consequently, the application was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed as infructuous.
Application under Section 482 CRPC held infructuous; consequently, the application was dismissed.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6360 of 2021 Applicant :- Smt Nidhirani Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Gupta,Mahesh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
On the matter being taken up, Sri Dinesh Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for applicant contends that present application has been rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, present application be dismissed as infructuous.
Learned AGA representing opposite party no. 1 has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for applicant.
In view of the above, present application is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Order Date :- 4.10.2021 Arif
Smt Nidhirani
State of U.P.
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court