Hameeda Rahman v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application under Section 482 CrPC, the Single Judge directed the High Court to recall the order and dispose of the pending explanation application in an unreasonable delay of approximately six years.
What did the court decide?
The High Court was directed to record an explanation from the original impugned order within 2 months on the merits of the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5714 of 2021
Applicant :- Hameeda Rahman Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Irfan Ali,Mohd Naushad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
/kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] Execution Case No. 41 of 2015, vUrxZr /kkjk 125 lu 2015] tks Lis’ky fiazfliy tt] Qsfeyh dksVZ@ ,fM’kuy fMfLVzDV tt] dksVZ ua0 9] iz;kxjkt ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS] dk fuLrkj.k 'kh/kzrk ds vk/kkj ij djus dk funsZ’k fn, tkus gsrq nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk vuqjks/k gS fd mijksDr okn voj U;k;ky; esa lu 2015 ls yfEcr gS rFkk yxHkx 6 o"kZ O;rhr gksus ds mijkUr Hkh vHkh rd okn dk vfUre :i ls fuLrkj.k ugha gks ldk gS ,oa mDr okn ds 'kh/kz fuLrkj.k gksus dh laHkkouk utj ugha vk jgh gS] blfy, lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dks mDr okn dk fuLrkj.k 'kh/kzrk ds vk/kkj ij djus dk funsZ’k fn;k tk;A
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd laHkor% ;g foyEc dksfoM ds dkj.k gks ldrk gSA
eSaus vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should direct the High Court to determine the application for explanation regarding an impugned order pending for nearly 6 years.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Hameeda Rahman
- respondent
State of U.P. and Another
Coram
Gautam Chowdhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- A482/5714/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court