Partly allowed

Ramjeet and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Sept 2021A482/4769/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge High Court refused to modify the Supreme Court's order granting interim bail, reiterating that the High Court cannot exercise inferior jurisdiction by granting interim bail. The applicant's request to continue till further orders was rejected following an adjournment.

What did the court decide?

Three days extension granted for the applicant to appear before the Supreme Court before the main petition is disposed of.

Ramjeet and 5 Others Vs State of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 85

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4769 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Ramjeet And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

/kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 486 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 354] 323] 504] 506 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk gkbZos] ftyk eFkqjk esa izsf"kr vkjksi i= fn0 17&9&2020 ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 1626 lu 2020] tks vij l= U;k;k/kh’k@ Lis’ky tt ikDlks] eFkqjk ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS rFkk blesa ikfjr izlaKku vkns’k fn0 29&10&2020 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosndx.k ds fo:) mijksDr /kkjkvksa ds vUrxZr dksbZ vijk/k xfBr ugha gksrk gS rFkk vkosndx.k dks rax o ijs’kku djus dh uh;r ls mUgas mDr /kkjkvksa esa lafyIr fd;k x;k gS] ftlesa muds fo:) ,u0ch0MCyw0 tkjh dj fn;k x;k gSA mUgksaus vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa dqN lk{; U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd, gSaA

¶8

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dks lquus rFkk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ,oa muds }kjk vius rdZ ds leFkZu esa izLrqr fd, x, lk{; dk ifj’khyu djus ij mijksDr okn dh dk;Zokgh dks vikLr djus dk dksbZ leqfpr vk/kkj ugha gS] bl Lrj ij ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd vkosndx.k ds f[kykQ mijksDr /kkjkvksa ds vUrxZr dksbZ vijk/k xfBr ugha gksrk gSA vkosndx.k dh vksj ls tks rdZ izLrqr fd, x, gSa os fookfnr rkfF;d iz’u ls lacaf/kr gSa] ftuds fo"k; esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vkosnu i= ij dksbZ QSlyk nsuk laHko ugha gS] pwWfd mDr rkfF;d iz’uksa dk fofu’p; fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk gh lk{; vkus ds ckn fd;k tk ldrk gSA blfy, mijksDr okn dh dk;Zokgh dks vikLr fd, tkus laca/kh mudk vuqjks/k fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶9

gkyWkfd ;fn vkosndx.k vkt ls 2 lIrkg dh le;kof/k esa] lEcfU/kr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksrs gSa ,oa vkReleiZ.k djrs gSa ,oa tekur ds fy, vkosnui= izLrqr djrs gSa rks muds tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fuLrkj.k 'kh/kzrkiwoZd fu;eksa ds vuq:i fd;k tk;sxkA

¶10

mDr ds lEcU/k esa ;g Hkh Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks ;g vkns’k vkosndx.k dks tekur nsus gsrq ck/; ugha djrk oju v/khuLFk U;k;ky; vkosndx.k ds tekur izkFkZuki= dks mlds xq.k&nks"k ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkj.k djus gsrq Lora= gSA

¶11

vkt ls 3 lIrkg rd vkosndx.k ds fo:) fuxZr xSj tekurh okjaV lq"kqIrkoLFkk esa jgsxkA

¶12

mDr funsZ’kksa ds lkFk ;g izkFkZuki= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶13

fn0 % 16&9&2021 ds0lh0flag

Ramjeet and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramjeet and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Asma and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shahnawaz (Minor) Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jeetu @ Jitendra (Minor) Vs State of Up and Another

Shree Niwas and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Priyesh Kumar Tiwari and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Anil Kumar @ Pawan Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another