The court granted one month adjournment in an application under Section 482 CrPC pending further modelling of the appeal from the subordinate court. The applicant is directed to proceed with the next logical step based on the hearing outcome.
Adjournment of one month granted to applicant for further modelling of appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3873 of 2021
Applicant :- Vijai Pratap Singh And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ramsagar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosndx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] ifjokn okn la0 22 lu 2017] vUrxZr /kkjk 323] 504] 506] 427 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk dIrku xat] ftyk cLrh ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd bl izdj.k esa i{kdkjksa ds e/; lqyg le>kSrk gks tkus dh laHkkouk gS] blfy, bl izdj.k dks lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; ds lqyg le>kSrk dsUnz dks jsQj dj fn;k tk;A
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks mudk ;g vuqjks/k Lohdkj fd, tkus esa dksbZ vkifRr ugha gSA
ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds n`f"Vxr bl izdj.k esa ;g funsZf’kr fd;k tkrk gS fd nksuksa i{kdkj lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj ekeys dks lqyg le>kSrk ds }kjk fuLrkfjr djus ds fy, vkosnu i= izLrqr djsaA ;fn izdj.k dks lqyg le>kSrk ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkfjr djus ds laca/k esa vkosnu i= voj U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS rks lacaf/kr U;k;ky; }kjk vkosnu i= izLrqr fd, tkus dh frfFk ls ,d lIrkg ds vUnj ml ij mfpr vkns’k ikfjr fd;k tk; rFkk lacaf/kr ehfM,s’ku lsUVj }kjk mls 4 ekg ds vUnj fuLrkfjr dj fn;k tk;A
vkt ls 5 ekg rd vkosnd ds fo:) mijksDr okn esa leLr vfxze dk;Zokgh LFkfxr jgsxhA
;gkW ij ;g Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn i{kdkjksa ds e/; mDr ehfM,s’ku dh izfdz;k foQy gksrh gS rks lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; mijksDr okn esa vkosnd ds fo:) fu;ekuqlkj fof/kd dk;Zokgh djus dks Lora= gS] vkSj ;fn i{kdkjksa ds e/; mDr ehfM,s’ku dh izfdz;k lQy gksrh gS rks vkosnd ehfM,s’ku lsUVj dh ml vk[;k ds lkFk bl U;k;ky; esa vkus dks Lora= gSaA
mijksDr vH;qfDr ds lkFk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr izLrqr fd;k x;k ;g vkosnu i= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA
fn0 % 11&11&2021 ds0lh0flag
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order must be quashed to effectively grant relief to the parties?
Vijai Pratap Singh And Another
State Of U.P. And Another
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
