A single judge dismissed a Section 482 application for want of prosecution after 11 years passed with no presence of the applicant to press the matter.
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution and any interim order is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3664 of 2009
Applicant :- Mayank Sabbarwal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sujeet Kumar,Chhaya Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
List has been revised. None present on behalf of the applicant to press the present application. Learned A.G.A. for the Staterespondent is present.
The present application is of the year 2009. More than 11 years have already been elapsed.
It appears that by efflux of time, either the parties have lost their interest or the matter has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case, if cause of action still survives, then applicant may approach this Court to recall this order.
Order Date :- 23.11.2021 Ankita
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mayank Sabbarwal
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
