The High Court dismisses a Section 482 application as infructuous due to the efflux of time, noting the matter became time-barred.
Application dismissed as infructuous; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 29285 of 2007
Applicant :- P.N. Parya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- V.B. Rao,Rachna Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None present on behalf of applicants. Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
It appears from the record that the matter has become infructuous by efflux of time.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
However, it will be open for the parties to move appropriate application within six weeks' from today, if the matter survives.
Order Date :- 25.11.2021 shiv
P.N. Parya
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
