Anju Devi v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear to press the matter.
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 26763 of 2007
Applicant :- Anju Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- A.B.Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
List revised.
None present on behalf of the applicant to press this application. Learned A.G.A. is present.
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Order Date :- 8.11.2021 SA
Anju Devi
State of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court