Nitto @ Netrapal and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings, the court held that submissions regarding false implication and malicious prosecution relate to disputed defence. Since appraisal of evidence is not permissible, the application was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Application dismissed; no occasion arises to entertain the petition as it relates to disputed defence.