Disposed

Jitendra Nath Pandey and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC21 Jan 2021A482/19069/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge heard an application under S. 482 Cr.P.C. where applicants withdrew their petition to quash the charge sheet but sought only expeditious bail consideration. The court refused the quashing prayer but directed that if the applicants surrender within 30 days with a bail application, it shall be disposed of expeditiously, with no coercive action in that interim.

What did the court decide?

Refused to quash charge sheet; directed that if applicants surrender within 30 days and seek bail, the bail application shall be disposed of expeditiously.

Jitendra Nath Pandey and 3 Others Vs State of Up… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 79

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 19069 of 2020

¶3

Applicant :- Jitendra Nath Pandey And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Alok Krishan Tripathi,Pradeep Pandey

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Vivek Rastogi, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record.

¶7

This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the charge sheet dated 5.6.2019 and the cognizance order dated 22.7.2019 in Criminal Case No. 814 of 2019 (State Vs. Jitendra Nath Pandey & others) arising out of Case Crime No. 78 of 2018, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452 IPC, Police Station Sadat, District Ghazipur, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur.

¶8

At the very out-set learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants submits that he does not want to press the principal prayers made in this application. He is ready to submit to the jurisdiction of the court, seek bail and accept all the conditions which this Court may deem fit to impose upon them. The only prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is for expeditious disposal of their bail application.

¶9

In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants, the prayer, so far as it relates to seeking quashing of the charge sheet as well as cognizance order, stands refused.

¶10

However, it is directed that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in view of the settled law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

¶11

For a period of 30 days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶12

It is made clear that no application seeking extension of time shall be entertained if this order is not complied with within the

¶13

aforesaid period.

¶14

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of.

¶15

Order Date :- 21.1.2021 Lbm/-

Jitendra Nath Pandey and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Nath Pandey and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Beeru Singh and Another Vs State of U.P.

Manveer Singh Vs State of U.P.

Fardeen Vs State of U.P.

Harish Kumar and 4 Other Vs Union of India

Jalandhar Traders Vs State of U.P. and Another

Abid Vs State of U.P. and Another