Dinesh Chandra Pathak v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as no appearance was made by the applicant to press the matter on the listed date.
Application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as no appearance was made by the applicant to press the matter on the listed date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 42
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16950 of 2009
Applicant :- Dinesh Chandra Pathak Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vishal Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 25.11.2021 Prakhar
Dinesh Chandra Pathak
State of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court