Rajendra @ Rajinder Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed Article 226 application under Section 482 CrPC, wherein applicant chose not to press the matter. No objection was raised by the State.
The High Court dismissed Article 226 application under Section 482 CrPC, wherein applicant chose not to press the matter. No objection was raised by the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12939 of 2021
Applicant :- Rajendra @ Rajinder Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Daya Shanker Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Shri Daya Shanker Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not wish to press the application and that he would seek the appropriate remedy available under law.
Shri Jhamman Ram, learned AGA for the State-opposite party has no objection to the prayer so made.
The application stands dismissed accordingly.
Office to return the certified copy of the order after retaining a photostat copy thereof.
Order Date :- 27.8.2021 Kirti
(Dr. Y.K. Srivastava, J)
Rajendra @ Rajinder Kumar
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court