An application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Vaidpal Singh was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had expired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 90
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 12134 of 2005
Applicant :- Vaidpal Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Yusuf Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Sunil Vashisth
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
None appears for the applicant in revised list. Advocate for the respondent, Sri Sunil Vashisth, is present.
As per the office report, the applicant herein, Sri Vaidpal Singh, has expired.
Therefore, the matter becomes infructuous and is dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 26.10.2021 Shalini
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vaidpal Singh
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
