The petitioner withdrew a writ petition under Article 226. With the consent of the respondent, the single judge dismissed the petition accordingly.
Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 385 of 2021
Petitioner :- Satyaveer Singh Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Singh,Shivam Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Anurag Dubey
Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.
Sri Akhilesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments, the petitioner does not wish to pursue the matter any further and that the same may be dismissed.
Sri Anurag Dubey, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and Ms. Sushma Soni, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State respondent, have no objection to the prayer so made.
The petition stands dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 20.7.2021 Pratima
(Dr.Y.K.Srivastava,J.)
Satyaveer Singh Yadav
State Of U.P.
Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
