Dismissed¶3
Ajay Kumar Maurya v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Allahabad HCWRIC/9889/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Ajay Kumar Maurya v. State of U.P. and 3 others; WRIT - C No. 9889 of 2020; order dated 9.7.2020; single judge (Saumitra Dayal Singh, J.); subject-matter: offending encroachment on petitioner's land and chak marg carved on it; encroachment removed and chak marg done away per statements of counsel and Additional Chief Standing Counsel; writ petition held infructuous and dismissed; counsel: Kailash Nath Singh for petitioner, Indra Jeet Yadav for respondent no.4, C.S.C. for State-respondents.
What did the court decide?
In view of the statement that the offending encroachment on the petitioner's land, including the chak marg carved on it, had been removed, the writ petition became infructuous and was dismissed accordingly. ¶3