The writ petition was dismissed in default as no petitioner's counsel appeared to press the petition despite a list revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5417 of 2012
Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Rathore And Others Respondent :- Union Of India And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Chaubey Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Amrish Sahai,Manish Trivedi,R.B. Sahai
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
The list has been revised. Even though learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 is present, none appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed in default. Order Date :- 6.1.2020 Amit Mishra
Santosh Kumar Rathore And Others
Union Of India And Others
Shashi Kant Gupta
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
