The High Court directed the petitioner to approach the Executive Officer with a proper representation regarding the grievance within six weeks and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21159 of 2020
Petitioner :- Asma Begum Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Raj Prajapati Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shiv Bahadur Yadav
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Sri Shiv Bahadur Yadav learned Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.4, Nagar Panchayat, Prayagraj.
For the grievance raised in the present petition, it would be appropriate that the petitioner may move a proper representation/application before the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Handiya, Prayagraj.
In case, such an application is moved by the petitioner before the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Handiya District Prayagraj, he shall take appropriate decision in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.12.2020 Harshita
Asma Begum
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
