This court made absolute an interim order for online marriage registration, directing petitioners to approach the SSP in compliance with Lata Singh law, then disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 43
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20070 of 2020
Petitioner :- Sakshi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Sharma,Prashant Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
Heard Shri Satish Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners and Shri Ajeet Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
Petitioners have applied for online registration of their marriage. There is already an interim order dated 02.12.2020, whereby petitioners have been directed to approach SSP, who shall take necessary steps in view of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh vs. State of UP; AIR 2006 SC 2522.
Above interim order is made absolute. In above terms, petition is disposed off .
Order Date :- 10.12.2020 LN Tripathi
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lata Singh vs. State of UPReferred¶6
Lata Singh vs. State of UP; AIR 2006 SC 2522 · Who else cites this
Sakshi
Sakshi and Another
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
