Ramautar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 32

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17006 of 2020

Petitioner :- Ramautar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Mohan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶5

This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, for the following relief:

¶6

"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the insurance amount to the petitioner under Mukhyamantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Beema Yojna."

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶8

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to make a fresh representation before the Respondent No. 3, District Magistrate ventilating his grievances within 15 days from today along with a copy of this order enclosing therewith a copy of the writ petition, copy of the earlier representation and its annexures and, if any such representation is made, the said authority shall make all endeavour to consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously

¶9

preferably within three months from the date of receipt of the said representation.

¶10

Order Date :- 21.10.2020 MLK

Ramautar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramautar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Faiyaz Ahmad Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Faiyuyaj Khan Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Suraj Rai Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rajman Gautam Vs State of U P and 3 Others

Murli Lal Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sanjeev Kumar Dwivedi Vs Union of India and 3 Others