Disposed
Mohd. Naved Ansari v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Allahabad HCWRIC/1274/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1274 of 2020…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1274 of 2020…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1274 of 2020
Petitioner :- Mohd. Naved Ansari Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhuvnesh Kumar Singh,Niraj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjai Singh
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sanjai Singh, learned counsel for the respondent Bank and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from him.
Admittedly, the petitioner took loan from the respondent-Bank concerned out of which petitioner has not paid substantial amount.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to deposit the entire amount in easy installments. Learned counsel for the Bank states that the anxiety of the Bank is that the amount should be recovered back and has no objection if the installments are fixed in the matter by this Court.
Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:
(i) Petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs. 200,000( rupees two lacs only) on or before 30th May, 2020 and rest of installments shall be deposited in four instalments at the interval of two months i.e. on 31st August,2020, 30th November, 2020, 28th February, 2021 and 31st May, 20201 respectively. These deposits shall be made before the Branch of the Bank from where the loan was taken.
(iii) Recovery proceedings during this period shall remain in abeyance. In case petitioner commits default in depositing any of the aforesaid installments within the stipulated period of time, it will be open to the respondents to start the recovery proceedings again by taking coercive process.
(iv) Petitioner may file an application for supply of statement of account along with the duly stamped self addressed envelope. In case any such application is filed, the concerned branch of the Bank will give the same to the petitioner after deposit of the first installment within fifteen days and in calculating the arrears, the amount (if any) already paid will be adjusted.
(v) If any fact stated by the petitioner is found to be incorrect, it will be open for the bank authorities to move an application for modification/recall of the order.
(vi) In case all the installments are deposited as per the schedule fixed, the petitioner may approach the Collector concerned for waiving the recovery charges. In the event such an application
is filed, it shall be dealt with in accordance with law by the authority concerned.
The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction.
Order Date :- 18.1.2020 MLK
Mohd. Naved Ansari
State Of U.P.
Shashi Kant Gupta
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court