Subhash Chandra v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the third respondent to conclude suspension proceedings against the petitioner under the Essential Commodities Act within two months, holding that sufficient time had passed for delay to accrue after the reply was submitted.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the 3rd respondent to conclude proceedings against the petitioner within two months from the date of service of this order.