This writ petition challenging proceedings under the U.P. Revenue Code was dismissed as premature. The court held that no cause of action accrued since no final orders had been passed by the revenue authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11427 of 2020
Petitioner :- Vishal Sharma Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Krishan Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J.
Heard the counsel for the petitioner.
The present writ petition has been filed challenging the entire proceedings in a case registered under Section 128 of the U.P Revenue Code, 2006.
No final orders have yet been passed by the concerned revenue authority.
In view of the aforesaid, no cause of action accrues to the petitioner to file the present writ petition.
The petition is premature and is dismissed.
Order Date :- 2.9.2020 IB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging revenue proceedings under Section 128 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is maintainable when no final order has been passed.
Vishal Sharma
State Of U.P.
Salil Kumar Rai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
