Imran @ Imran Hussain v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner as the claim was rendered infructuous with the passage of time.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner as the claim was rendered infructuous with the passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11270 of 2020
Petitioner :- Imran @ Imran Hussain Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahboob Ahmad Siddiqui,Faizul Hasan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Shri Faizul Hasan, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition is rendered infructuous with passage of time.
In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 17.11.2020 A. V. Singh
Imran @ Imran Hussain
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court