Since petitioners took no steps to effect service of notice and no one appeared on their behalf, the writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10895 of 2020
Petitioner :- Smt. Tabassum Bi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devi Prasad Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J.
List of cases shown in the additional cause list is revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioners. As per office report dated 6.8.2020, petitioners have otherwise not taken steps to effect service of notice upon the private respondents.
Writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 7.8.2020 Ashok Kr.
Smt. Tabassum Bi And Another
State Of U.P. And 8 Others
Ashwani Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
