Single judge observed it was not desirable to issue a positive direction to the Board of Revenue but expected a decision on the pending revision without undue adjournment and disposed the petition.
Expected expeditious decision on revision No.03 of 2008-09 without undue adjournment; no writ issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1055 of 2020
Petitioner :- Chandra Shekhar Respondent :- Member Board Of Revenue And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar,Sunil Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
"(i) to issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authority, Member Board of Revenue U.P. At Allahabad to decide the Revision No.03 of 2008-09 (Jai Prakash & Others. Vs. Babbu & Others) filed under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act being before the Member Board of Revenue U.P. at Allahabad."
Order Date :- 18.9.2020 S.Chaurasia
Chandra Shekhar
Member Board Of Revenue And 5 Others
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
