Disposed

Hemant Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC10 Dec 2020WRIA/9105/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, a Class-IV employee, sought promotion consideration denied by opposite parties. Court permitted petitioner to submit a fresh representation within three weeks. Opposite party directed to consider and decide within three months via reasoned order. Court reserved merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to the District Panchayat Raj Officer within three weeks; authority directed to decide within three months via reasoned order.

Hemant Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Service and Employment | Allahabad HC (2020)

¶1

Court No. - 72

¶2

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9105 of 2020

¶3

Petitioner :- Hemant Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Subhash Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶5

Counter affidavit filed today by learned standing counsel is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned standing counsel for State-respondents.

¶7

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present petition is filed by the petitioner claiming that he is working as Class-IV employee since the year 2001 and is entitled to be considered for promotion along with other similarly situated persons, however, the same is not being considered by the opposite parties.

¶8

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met, in case representation of petitioner for the said purpose is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶9

Learned standing counsel has no objection to the same.

¶10

In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to opposite party no.3 District Panchayat Raj Officer, District- Farrukhabad, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of three weeks from the date of submission of computer generated copy of this order.

¶11

In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, opposite party no.3 District Panchayat Raj Officer, District- Farrukhabad shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date of submission of computer generated copy of this order along with representation is placed before him after verifying the same from Official Website of Allahabad High Court.

¶12

It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the

¶13

merits of the case and all questions of fact and law are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.

¶14

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of . Order Date :- 10.12.2020 Junaid

Hemant Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hemant Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pooja Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Dr. Adarsh Srivastava Vs Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, N.A.C.O. New Delhi and 4 Others

Asgar Ali Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Satendra Singh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Ram Kewal and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Neha Shreya Vs Union of India and 3 Others