The High Court dismissed this writ petition seeking appointment on compassionate grounds. The court held the cause of action did not survive and stated the petitioner can challenge the rejection order separately.
None. The petition is dismissed as the cause of action does not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8469 of 2020
Petitioner :- Smt. Sheela Devi Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Hridaya Narain Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition to decide his claim for grant of appointment on compassionate grounds.
Shri Hridaya Narain Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner for grant of appointment on compassionate grounds has been rejected.
The cause of action on which the writ petition was founded does not survive.
The writ petition is dismissed.
It is always open to the petitioner to challenge the order of rejection of his claim for appointment on compassionate grounds.
Order Date :- 13.10.2020 Dhananjai
Smt. Sheela Devi
State of U.P.
Another
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
