The court dismissed the writ petition held viable as the underlying suspension order was subsequently revoked by the respondent state.
The writ petition is dismissed because the cause on which it was founded does not survive due to revocation of the suspension order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 83
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7631 of 2020
Petitioner :- Girish Chandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devesh Mishra,Arvind Tripathi,Vijay Gautam(Senior Adv.) Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Sri Devesh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State - respondents.
On the basis of instructions, learned Standing Counsel submits that the suspension order has been revoked.
Instructions are made in the part of the record.
The cause on which the writ petition was founded does not survive.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 20.10.2020 Ashish Tripathi
Girish Chandra
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
