The High Court dismissed this recalled writ petition after noting that no petitioner's counsel appeared and the matter was likely infructuous. The standing counsel for the State appeared but was not admitted to argue.
The writ petition is dismissed; any interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 36364 of 2005
Petitioner :- Balkhandi And Others Respondent :- U.P. Jal Nigam Thru Managing Director And Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- K.K. Triapthi Counsel for Respondent :- Q.H. Siddiqui, Vimlesh Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 27.1.2020 Siddhant Sahu
Balkhandi And Others
U.P. Jal Nigam
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
