This writ petition challenged the rejection of the petitioner's appointment as Head of Institution due to non-compliance with amended Government Order. The Court upheld the validity of the Government Order relying on a sister decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Reserved on 27.01.2020 (Court No. 34) Delivered on 22.04.2020 (In Chamber)
In Chamber
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3558 of 2019
Petitioner :- Smt. Mamta Jain Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aklank Kumar Jain,Sri. Radha Kant Ojha, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
(Delivered by Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J.)
2
of 2018 (C/M National Inter College and another Vs. State of U.P. and others) . Therefore, Government Order dated 12.32018, for the reasons stated in above judgment, cannot be said to be illegal and violative of Article 30 of the Constitution of India and therefore, same cannot be said to be vitiated in law.
Order Date :- 22.4.2020 Prajapati
3 issues framed by the court
Whether Government Order dated 12.03.2018 amending Regulation 17 is illegal and violative of Article 30 of the Constitution.
Whether the order of Joint Director of Education rejecting petitioner's appointment is valid.
Whether the petitioner can be appointed to the post of Head of Institution under amended regulations.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ Petition (Writ–A) No. 9650 of 2018 (C/M National Inter College and another Vs. State of U.P. and others)Relied on¶4
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Smt. Mamta Jain
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
Rajeev Misra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
