Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sandeep Sharma Vs State of U.P. and Others — Writ and Judicial Review | Allahabad HC (2020)

Home
Allahabad HC
2020
Sandeep Sharma Vs State of U.P. and OthersSandeep Sharma v. State of U.P. and Others

Dismissed

Sandeep Sharma v. State of U.P. and Others

Allahabad HC22 Jan 2020WRIA/32470/2005

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed a writ petition calling in revision due to petitioner's absence and lack of active cause of action, vacating any interim order.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

This writ petition, called in revision, was dismissed in the absence of the petitioner. The Court held that the cause of action likely no longer survives, rendering the matter infructuous.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

Court No. - 34

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 32470 of 2005

Petitioner :- Sandeep Sharma Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C., K.D. Tiwari, M.C. Chaturvedi

Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.

Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Sri K.D. Tiwari, Advocate for respondents-3 and 4 and learned Standing Counsel for State of U.P. are present.

It appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.

Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Order Date :- 22.1.2020 Siddhant Sahu

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Sandeep Sharma
respondent
State of U.P.
respondent
Others

Coram

AI extract

Sudhir Agarwal

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Allahabad HC
Decided on: 22 Jan 2020 · January
Registered: 20 Apr 2005
Case no.: WRIA/32470/2005
CNR: UPHC010075392005
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: Sudhir Agarwal
Disposal: Dismissed on merits

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Sudhir Agarwal

M/S the Azad Co. Vs State of U.P. and Another
18 Jan 2020
M/S Galaxy Electronics Vs State of U.P. and Another
18 Jan 2020
M/S Shyam Radio and Electronics Vs State of U.P. and Another
18 Jan 2020
Vikram Singh Vs State of U.P.
22 Jan 2020
Pran Nath Tiwari Vs State of U.P. and Others
22 Jan 2020
Vijayanand Rai Vs the Governor Reserve Bank of India and Others
22 Jan 2020

Cite this judgement

Sandeep Sharma v. State of U.P. and Others, WRIA/32470/2005 (ALL), decided on 22 January 2020.

The Allahabad High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Sudhir Agarwal

Parties & counsel