The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution due to non-appearance and presumed lack of interest.
Petitioner permitted to move a recall application within 30 days if cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20473 of 2007
Petitioner :- Smt. Anju Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Others Counsel for Petitioner :- O.P. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjai Singh
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of petitioner to press this writ petition.
From perusal of the record, it appears that matter might have become infructuous by efflux of time and it seems that petitioner is no more interested in pursing the same.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case the cause of action still survives, the petitioner will be at liberty to move a recall application within 30 days from today.
Order Date :- 17.12.2020
Ajeet
Smt. Anju Singh
State of U.P.
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
