Ram Surat v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous due to subsequent developments.
The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous due to subsequent developments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2011 of 2019
Petitioner :- Ram Surat Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
The writ petition has become infructuous on account of subsequent developments. It is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.8.2020 SR
Ram Surat
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court