Fatema Parveen v. State of U P and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J. dismissed the writ petition dated 15.12.2020 as infructuous upon the submission of the counsel that the petition had become infructuous.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J. dismissed the writ petition dated 15.12.2020 as infructuous upon the submission of the counsel that the petition had become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11903 of 2020
Petitioner :- Fatema Parveen Respondent :- State Of U P And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Mr. Ashish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 15.12.2020 SY
Fatema Parveen
State Of U P
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court