Smt. Seema Devi v. the State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
l a [;k 82 nkf.Md izdh.kZ LFkkukUrj.k…
l a [;k 82 nkf.Md izdh.kZ LFkkukUrj.k…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
nkf.Md izdh.kZ LFkkukUrj.k izkFkZuk i= la[;k 572 o"kZ 2015
Jherh lhek nsoh &&&&&&&&&&&& vkosfndk
izfr
jkT; mRrj izns'k ,oa vU; &&&&&&&& foi{khx.k
ekuuh; cPPkw yky] U;k;ewfrZ
foi{kh la[;k 2 dh vksj ls iwjd izfr'kiFki= nkf[ky fd;k x;k bls i=koyh ij j[kk tk,A
;g nkf.Md izdh.kZ LFkkukUrj.k vkosnu i=] vkosfndk dh vksj ls eqdnek la[;k 350 o"kZ 2011] ¼jkT; izfr nhukukFk½ eqdnek vijk/k la[;k 418 o"kZ 2010] vUrxZr /kkjk 498&,-] 323] 504] 506] 354 Hkk0na0la0 o /kkjk 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk gf.M;k] ftyk bykgkckn dks vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLVsªV] lIre~ bykgkckn ds U;k;ky; ls tuin lar jfonkl uxj] Hknksgh ds fdlh l{ke U;k;ky; esa LFkkukUrfjr djus gsrq ;ksftr fd;k x;k gSA
eSusa vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] foi{kh la[;k 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk ,oa i=koyh dk lE;d ifj'khyu fd;kA
vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDRkk }kjk eq[; :i ls ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd vkosfndk dh iq=h lksuh vk;q 13 o"kZ fodykax gS ftldh fodyakxrk] izek.k i= esa 70 izfr n'kkZ;h x;h gSA vkosfndk us vius ifr ds fo:} /kkjk 125 na0 iz0 la0 ds vUrxZr Hkj.k iks"k.k gsrq ,d vkosnu i= tuin lar jfonkl uxj] Hknksgh esa ;ksftr fd;k Fkk ftlesa ikfjr vkns'k ds vuqikyu esa foi{kh la[;k 2 Hkj.k iks"k.k dh /kujkf'k vnk ugha dj jgs gSA vkosfndk dks iSjoh gsrq tuin bykgkckn vkus tkus esa vlqfo/kk gksxh mldh ,d cPph fodykax gS tSlk fd Åij mYys[k fd;k tk pqdk gSA bl izdkj dqy feykdj ;g ;kpuk
2
dh x;h gS fd iz'uxr izdj.k dks tuin bykgkckn ls tuin lar jfonkl uxj] Hknksgh ds fdlh l{ke U;k;ky; esa LFkkukUrfjr fd;k tk,A
blds foijhr foi{kh la[;k 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDRkk rFkk jkT; dh vksj ls fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDRkk }kjk ;g rdZ izLrqr fd;k x;k fd Hkj.k iks"k.k ls lEcfU/kr okn vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr gks pqdk gSA iz'uxr izdj.k izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ij vk/kkfjr gS tks ,d LVsV dsl gSA bl eqdnesa esa Hkh vkosfndk dh lk{; iw.kZ gks pqdh gS mls U;k;ky; esa ckj&ckj vkus dh vko';drk ugha gS rFkk mHk; i{kksa ds e/; MkbokslZ Hkh gks pqdk gSA vr,o ;g vkosnu i= fujLr gksus ;ksX; gSA
mYys[kuh; gS fd iz'uxr izdj.k LVsV dsl gS ftlesa vkosfndk dh lk{; U;k;ky; ds le{k vafdr dh tk pqdh gSA iz'uxr izdj.k esa vkosfndk dh O;fDrxr mifLFkfr ek= lk{; gsrq gh vfuok;Z gksrh gS mldh lk{; vafdr dh tk pqdh gSA
izdj.k ds leLr rF; ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, esjs fopkj ls iz'uxr izdj.k dks vij eq[; U;kf;d eftLVsªV] lIre~ bykgkckn ds U;k;ky; ls tuin lar jfonkl uxj] Hknksgh LFkkukUrfjr djus dk dksbZ i;kZIr vk/kkj ugha ik;k tkrk gS rnuqlkj ;g vkosnu i= cyghu gS ,oa fujLr gksus ;ksX; gSA
rnuqlkj ;g vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA fnukad%&21&1&2020@v-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to maintain this petition filed by a 13-year-old minor for quashing of criminal proceedings under various sections.
Whether the appellant minor will suffer irreparable loss by having to travel to the judicial magistrate in Bajna from her parents' residence.
Jherh lhek nsoh
State of Jharkhand and ors.
nkf.Md izdh.kZ LFkkukUrj.k izkFkZuk i= la[;k 572 o"kZ 2015
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court