Smt. Nisha v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
A child of the respondent was transferred under Section 323 and 354 IPC. The petitioner state sought to have the case tried by the District Court in the city where the tenant resides, avoiding any inconvenience to the child. The court found that transferring the case to the city court was legally permissible and ordered it. The child's present residence is in 'tuin', a distance of 160 km from the
What did the court decide?
The child was transferred to the city court for trial, which is legally permissible, to avoid inconveniences to the child.