This single-line order dismissed a Sales/Trade Tax Revision for want of prosecution after the revisionist failed to appear despite service through the firm's manager.
Dismissed for want of prosecution
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 41
Case :- SALES/TRADE TAX REVISION No. - 1258 of 2012
Revisionist :- M/S Yum Restaurants India Pvt. Ltd. Opposite Party :- The Commissioner Commercial Tax Lko. Counsel for Revisionist :- Piyush Agrawal,Bharat Ji Agrawal Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J.
After notices were returned with a remark of the Post-Office that the firm was not found on the address given in the Revision, learned Standing Counsel has served the firm through the Manager. This shows that even though applicants have been served, they are not interested in pursuing the Revision.
The Revision is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 6.3.2020 GS
(Siddhartha Varma, J.)
M/S Yum Restaurants India Pvt. Ltd.
The Commissioner Commercial Tax Lko.
Siddhartha Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
