On going through the entire record, we do not find any merit in this appeal. At the first instance, it would be appropriate to state that the argument advanced by learned counsel for the appellant that no reservation could have been applied in the instant matter as the cadre of Workshop Instructor (Foundry) consists only one post is having no merit in view of the fact that, as a matter of fact, the cadre is of Workshop Instructor and not of any one trade like Foundry. The appellant appears to be confused with cadre strength and the post advertised. The reservation applies on cadre and vacancies are required to be filled in as per the applicable roster. There is no material available on record to disbelieve the stand taken by the respondents that in the cadre of Workshop Instructor, the post was coming on reservation point and that was to be filled in from the Member belonging to Scheduled Castes. Beside above, in the year 1992, it was communicated to the Institution that the post of Workshop Instructor is a teaching post and that is required to be filled in by adhering the procedure applicable for teaching post and despite of that, the procedure applicable was not adhered. The respondents, as such, are right in concluding that the appointment of appellant was de hor the Rules.
