From perusal of the order aforesaid, it is apparent that permission was granted by the Court to withdraw the writ petition after hearing that and during the course of dictating the judgment. It is also apparent that no liberty was granted by the Court to file a fresh petition for writ. Though the writ petition was dismissed, but in the light of an interim order that was earlier passed, the appellant-petitioner was allowed to continue in service. On knowing about dismissal of the writ petition, the respondents terminated the appellant-petitioner from service under an order dated 05.05.2005. A challenge was given to the order dated 05.05.2005 by way of filing a petition for writ, i.e., Writ Petition No. 46582 of 2005 that came to be disposed of on 07.09.2006 by permitting the petitioner to move a representation before the District Magistrate, Agra ventilating her grievance. The District Magistrate, Agra considered the representation and rejected the same by holding that the appointment given on compassionate grounds was erroneous. The appellant-petitioner again approached the writ Court to challenge the order passed by the District Magistrate and that came to be dismissed under the judgment impugned. Learned Single Bench held that after dismissal of the writ petition No. 30900 of 1991, there was no occasion for the petitioner to challenge the order of termination by way of filing a separate writ petition.
