The appellant failed to appear despite list revision. As the appeal has been pending since 1979, the court dismissed it for want of prosecution.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 53
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 3278 of 1979
Appellant :- Raghunath Singh Respondent :- Rajpal Singh And Others Counsel for Appellant :- M.A. Zaidi Counsel for Respondent :- V.P. Goal
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
None is present on behalf of the appellant, even when the list was revised.
As nobody is appearing for the appellant and since the appeal is pending since 1979, it appears that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 17.1.2020
Pr/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should proceed in the absence of the appellant despite the revision of the list.
Raghunath Singh
Rajpal Singh
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
