Subhash Chandra v. Daya Shankar and 24 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed - no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC against concurrent findings of fact; suit by heirs of Badri Nath @ Badri Prasad for permanent injunction/alternative eviction over Survey No.191-B (spot map A.B.C.D.) failed as plaintiff could not identify the land or prove cause of action; defendants' well (kuan) in existence 17 years; trial: Additional Civil Judge (JD)-II, Bhadohi-Gyanpur (18.10.2016); first appeal: Additional District Judge, Court No.1, Bhadohi-Gyanpur (04.10.2017); Single Judge: Vivek Agarwal, J.; decided 4.2.2020.
What did the court decide?
No substantial question of law has been made out in the present case against the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the courts below. ¶10