Case dismissed for want of instruction. The appellant did not have instructions, resulting in no substantive decision or general legal principle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 53
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 189 of 2016
Appellant :- Kashmiri Respondent :- Tungli Dead And 4 Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Jeevan Prakash Sharma,Sanjay Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J.
Sri Prashant Sharma, Advocate (A/P0208/18) submits that he has no instructions in the matter.
Accordingly, case is dismissed for want of instruction.
Order Date :- 20.2.2020 Ashutosh
Kashmiri
Tungli Dead And 4 Ors.
Vivek Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
