A habeas corpus writ petition filed by Rashid @ Pistan was dismissed by the High Court as infructuous because the maximum period of detention had expired by the time the matter was heard.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 29
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 828 of 2019
Petitioner :- Rashid @ Pistan Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hare Krishna Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Pradeep Kumar Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents.
Learned A.G.A. states that the petition has become infructuous as the maximum detention period is over.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.2.2020 Mini
Rashid @ Pistan
State Of U.P.
Pankaj Mithal
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
